Marijuana actually is bad for you, mmkay — Many times now I have received comments praising the effects of marijuana. You should get stoned and drop out, man. Wow, the weed is so great huh?
The sole purpose of the United States government is a form of collectivism that is supposed to protect the rights of each individual: Whether or not the substance will make the individual happier is irrelevant.
One of the reasons, proponents argue, that drug prohibition was established, or at least still remains, is to protect children. The fallacy of this logic is that it is nearly impossible, especially if drugs are illegal, to completely keep drugs away from children. Unless there is a substantial DEA budget increase, there will always be a black market for drugs in the United States.
In a black market, a government has absolutely no regulation over the marketing strategy or distribution of a product.
Drug dealers can market and distribute drugs wherever, whenever, and to whomever they want. Children, because they are too innocent and immature to understand the consequences, are the easiest consumers for drug dealers to target, especially in poor urban neighborhoods.
A better way to keep drugs away from children is regulation rather than prohibition. For example, since cigarette companies were prohibited from selling and advertising to children, cigarette use has decreased dramatically.
Children were educated about the dangers of smoking, and cigarettes became harder for children to obtain, thus reducing the number of children smoking. A national pole taken from middle and high school students indicated that it is easier to obtain marijuana than alcohol or cigarettes.
Drug prohibition does not protect children; it actually promotes situations for drug dealers and criminals to take advantage of them. It is argued that since drugs have such negative effects, drug prohibition is necessary to prevent their use.
The negative effects of drugs are well known to everyone. Certain drugs can cause heart failure, brain damage, even death, among other things. The illicit status of cocaine and marijuana were nearly the same throughout the country inso what accounted for the discrepancy?
The effects of marijuana are much less severe that those of cocaine, explaining why marijuana is more widely used than cocaine.
Some argue that the negative effects of certain drugs include increased risk of criminal behavior. Cocaine, heroine, and marijuana supposedly create a sense of disillusion and distort reality in such a way that creates lapses in judgment of the user.
Assuming that certain drugs do cause criminal behavior, although many including myself are skeptical, prohibition causes even worse criminal behavior.
The black market is a completely free market with no regulation, contract enforcement, or property laws. Essentially, in the absence of any law enforcement, anarchy is formed. Property laws, regulation and contracts must be enforced by each individual.
This underground market creates astronomical amounts of crime that is many times worse than that which would occur from the result of the drug itself. Alcohol prohibition is a good example of this. But the experiment of alcohol prohibition proved beyond a reasonable doubt that, even though Americans consumed less alcohol, crime was rampant throughout the country.
The overall effects of alcohol consumption was insignificant compared to social problems caused by crime during prohibition, which is why the 21st amendment negated alcohol prohibition entirely. Drug prohibition may not have the extreme effects of alcohol prohibition, but the effects are significant nonetheless, especially in poor urban neighborhoods with economical problems.
Furthermore, there is no congressional authority for the United States government to regulate, much less prohibit, any substance, via the tenth amendment: In summary, drug prohibition is an utter failure and unconstitutional, and should be revoked immediately.
The targeting of children and destruction of poor neighborhoods by the illegal drug market, the cost in billions of dollars to taxpayers, and the lives ruined from prison terms for non-violent crimes more than overwhelms the slight possibility of higher drug usage in America.
Report this Argument Pro I actually dislike the drug war and would like to see it gone, but I think I can make a debate from the other side. Taking this definition of immoral into account, "not conforming to the patterns of conduct usually accepted or established as consistent with principles of personal and social ethics.
As a society and socially the standard established principle is that drug use is bad, and should therefore be fought, by making it illegal and punishing those distributing it or consuming it.
Many people have seen first hand the extreme detrimental effects certain drugs can have not only on the consumer but those close to the consumer.Brain scans showed the cannabis users had significantly blunted dopamine responses compared with the controls who had never taken the drug.; Research links marijuana use to mental health problems: anxiety, depression, suicidal thoughts, schizophrenia and short-term psychosis.; The most commonly reported side effects of smoking marijuana are intense anxiety and panic attacks.
Phil study guide by MerciBest includes 38 questions covering vocabulary, terms and more.
It's a bad idea in practice because prohibiting the drug use, because it's obstructing the liberties of the people. Nadelmann relates drug prohibition to the prohibition of alcohol and uses the same opposition beliefs: "Adult Americans have .
Punishment and Prejudice: Judging Drug-Using Pregnant Women Lynn M. Paltrow Throughout the late 's and still today, "crack moms" and "crack babies" are the subject of vigorous public debate. A former student in Arizona's impoverished Safford Unified School District felt, quite rightly, that school administrators violated her constitutional protections when they strip-searched her in search of prescription-strength ibuprofen in The Global Financial System Is About To Shift: Part I October 13 | From: TheMindUnleashed Behind all the chatter of who will be the United States’ next President, there is .
The deeper issue that never sees the light of day is the hypocrisy of the so called “war on drugs”. This of course is a misnomer for the “war on illegal drugs”.